October 2006:
Decree long-awaited (three years) at last ... .. the courts have decided under the old law by removing any possibility of the child's father live it properly by triumph and his mother and his sense of possession .... For days, I say to myself, to soothe the excruciating pain I feel that would lead me to judge, to deny justice to accuse of dishonesty and blindness, many people, a judge is a person first and then if it is wrong in its ruling, if is "blind" to reality it is within its limits of being human, if a mother is selfish, dishonest, it is as bad person and I understand this thinking to its poverty and insecurity in person. To think that a mother is so terrible, it's scary to think that a person is so, it is understandable, she was not having a daughter.
ask aid comparison, possible that many children, that our children must be damaged so avoidable and yet so heavy in the future?
LAW No. 8 February 2006 54: provisions relating to parental separation and joint custody of the children
Lords judges in your room when you decide, think of the faces of these children? Do you have photos of them before? No, I think not. I'm sure no, no human being collude with this mess. Possible that there is no judge or avvocato che abbia subito tutto questo……
Sapete, signori giudici, questa donna, che si fregia del termine "madre", come ha comunicato il decreto al bambino?
"Da oggi farai solo delle passeggiate con papà"
Avete idea del potere, coercitivo e manipolativo, di queste madri con dei bambini ancora molto piccoli? Enorme! Capite che nulla di tutto questo è amore? Caricare un bambino di tanti pesi?
Sapete come ha reagito il bambino? E' rimasto zitto, ha solo detto "Davvero" (che ovviamente la "madre" ha interpretato come gioia) annichilito.
Sapete, signori giudici, il bambino cosa ha fatto quando ha visto il padre? Ve lo racconto. E' got in the car and after a while, 'he said' It is true that we now only walks together, and why? I want to be with you! " Then he looked at his father's wife and said with a serious face "I pick her up, me tight, you make the little darlings" for half an hour and remained in that embrace. Then with a smile accompanied by sad eyes "Now we play?". And we played and laughed, trying to forget for a while '.
This is what happened judge.
you enormous power, power affect the lives of children, their suffering, their mental and psychological health, their future as adults. Yes, Lord, for this suffering, emotional distress these daranno vita ad uomini con forti disagi della personalità ed affettività.
Mi sto chiedendo se c'è una possibile correlazione tra l'aumento delle depressioni infantili, tra l'aumento dei suicidi tra gli adolescenti, dell'omosessualità, dell'uso di droghe ed alcol e queste vostre involontarie ma cieche deliberazioni a favore di donne che solo per il fatto di essere state feconde si attribuiscono il termine di madre ed il conseguente potere. Possibile che sia così difficile vedere che il loro uso dei bambini è strumentale alle loro invidie, gelosie, insicurezze? Alle loro paure di persone perdenti? Nulla a che fare con il ruolo di madre amorevole che pensa al bene del figlio pur con dei sacrifici sul suo orgoglio? Donne failed, but even with that son buying power than their parents.
Lords judges that I know of no literature on children who have had two good mothers showing damage, but surely there are tons of literature on the damage caused by one bad mother. So why should I feel "guilty" because a child asks me affection, security, protection is expected to be a mother? Why should we suffer a decree created a report from a social worker who is on her being a woman is allowed to judge a couple who lovingly believe in the meaning of marriage?
I read the law and more, wherever it emphasizes the "good of the child", of both parents important to the child, protection needs, including the experience of family and wonder and ask how many (judges, lawyers, professionals, parents and others) are willing to find answers or at least a comparison is
good for the child having to "suffer" without cause the decrease of the time with his father?
is good for the child to live thinking that the mother has sole power? (The law often collude with this fantasy that in the personality structure creates many hardships)
is good for the child can not have both parents as much as possible?
nature would always be parents together. The company has created the alternatives and the law lays down the rules for these "Alternative". In child protection, the law should not facilitate the kind? Certainly there are situations in which fathers are fugitives and have no chance to be there ... ... you can not force them. But where there is a father and want to realize the nature because the law prevents it? Because the law beats these fathers, tightening, leading in some cases to say. ... Disappear! or be willing to pay it. Perhaps we should review
many stories, perhaps many irresponsible fathers judged, they are now absent because of bad and selfish mother (who now know they exist) and the law blindly supports them.
The law should be fair and equitable. Do not be prejudiced and / or stereotypes.
is good for the child to hear "good morning" or "good night" from his father only twice per month, compared to 26 times those of the mother?
is good for the child to lunch or dinner only twice a month with his father over 26 with her mother?
is good for the child to deny the feelings that were born spontaneously than patients that are imposed because it managed to power? These are not violent?
is good for the child share the mother's selfishness and lies for love and honesty? How will grow up with a sound structure?
is good for the child living primarily with mother, self-interest and power proves single? We are not a society based on famiglia? Che carico avrà questo bambino, manipolato, verso questa madre che dichiara "sono solo tua" poi lo scarica dai nonni in verità per farsi la sua vita? Mi dispiace per questa donna che per sentirsi qualcuno ha bisogno di sentire di possedere qualcuno, il bambino. Ma provo dolore profondo pensando al bambino che deve subire questo. È violenza, violenza sottile, profonda, senza lividi e contusioni che si vedono ma ferite interne che sanguinano.
è bene per il bambino farlo sentire vittima e portarlo, come in alcuni "rapiti", ad essere protettore del proprio carnefice? Perché questo è quello che accade quando il bambino vede che un solo genitore ha il potere di togliergli l'altro, non sa che il vero potere è stato of blind justice.
three years trying to document, not to understand the child's sense of ownership ... in the end I would have thought that it was easy for me as well, we're young and given the mother's behavior, we might as well forget about the child. But his eyes can not be forgotten. Children have the right to receive the "wings" to fly from adults, not weights and heavy weights for their souls.
times the courts are so long, if that server is allowed to be social close the "practical" one encounter made two years ago to go to school now that the baby grew up, unable to express themselves more, would beyond what necessarily wanted to see.
I read about a judge who postponed the decision for custody of a teenager he read in the newspaper that the girl had committed suicide in the meantime. That father was right, that mother was a bad mother angry ... .. but now that matter, young life that could not fly!
This new law could help but is blocked by red tape, by prejudice, preconceptions, from old habits born at different times. ... In the meantime, too many children, including our live their pain in silence because they can not d ' express themselves and be heard.
Wonder if you can answer, a comparison, aid ... ..
I'm not used to bore those not interested and even to sell off my pain and that of the people I love. If these questions are of interest in other people, fathers, mothers, lawyers, judges, politicians are ready to share our personal story convinced that maybe we could go really well, one day, to protect children, children of the world.
I think it is the duty of all to find solutions for them if we are right in a civilized country.
A woman, a wife, mother without a chair!
thank the people who respond and those who already help my husband and me.
Decree long-awaited (three years) at last ... .. the courts have decided under the old law by removing any possibility of the child's father live it properly by triumph and his mother and his sense of possession .... For days, I say to myself, to soothe the excruciating pain I feel that would lead me to judge, to deny justice to accuse of dishonesty and blindness, many people, a judge is a person first and then if it is wrong in its ruling, if is "blind" to reality it is within its limits of being human, if a mother is selfish, dishonest, it is as bad person and I understand this thinking to its poverty and insecurity in person. To think that a mother is so terrible, it's scary to think that a person is so, it is understandable, she was not having a daughter.
ask aid comparison, possible that many children, that our children must be damaged so avoidable and yet so heavy in the future?
LAW No. 8 February 2006 54: provisions relating to parental separation and joint custody of the children
Lords judges in your room when you decide, think of the faces of these children? Do you have photos of them before? No, I think not. I'm sure no, no human being collude with this mess. Possible that there is no judge or avvocato che abbia subito tutto questo……
Sapete, signori giudici, questa donna, che si fregia del termine "madre", come ha comunicato il decreto al bambino?
"Da oggi farai solo delle passeggiate con papà"
Avete idea del potere, coercitivo e manipolativo, di queste madri con dei bambini ancora molto piccoli? Enorme! Capite che nulla di tutto questo è amore? Caricare un bambino di tanti pesi?
Sapete come ha reagito il bambino? E' rimasto zitto, ha solo detto "Davvero" (che ovviamente la "madre" ha interpretato come gioia) annichilito.
Sapete, signori giudici, il bambino cosa ha fatto quando ha visto il padre? Ve lo racconto. E' got in the car and after a while, 'he said' It is true that we now only walks together, and why? I want to be with you! " Then he looked at his father's wife and said with a serious face "I pick her up, me tight, you make the little darlings" for half an hour and remained in that embrace. Then with a smile accompanied by sad eyes "Now we play?". And we played and laughed, trying to forget for a while '.
This is what happened judge.
you enormous power, power affect the lives of children, their suffering, their mental and psychological health, their future as adults. Yes, Lord, for this suffering, emotional distress these daranno vita ad uomini con forti disagi della personalità ed affettività.
Mi sto chiedendo se c'è una possibile correlazione tra l'aumento delle depressioni infantili, tra l'aumento dei suicidi tra gli adolescenti, dell'omosessualità, dell'uso di droghe ed alcol e queste vostre involontarie ma cieche deliberazioni a favore di donne che solo per il fatto di essere state feconde si attribuiscono il termine di madre ed il conseguente potere. Possibile che sia così difficile vedere che il loro uso dei bambini è strumentale alle loro invidie, gelosie, insicurezze? Alle loro paure di persone perdenti? Nulla a che fare con il ruolo di madre amorevole che pensa al bene del figlio pur con dei sacrifici sul suo orgoglio? Donne failed, but even with that son buying power than their parents.
Lords judges that I know of no literature on children who have had two good mothers showing damage, but surely there are tons of literature on the damage caused by one bad mother. So why should I feel "guilty" because a child asks me affection, security, protection is expected to be a mother? Why should we suffer a decree created a report from a social worker who is on her being a woman is allowed to judge a couple who lovingly believe in the meaning of marriage?
I read the law and more, wherever it emphasizes the "good of the child", of both parents important to the child, protection needs, including the experience of family and wonder and ask how many (judges, lawyers, professionals, parents and others) are willing to find answers or at least a comparison is
good for the child having to "suffer" without cause the decrease of the time with his father?
is good for the child to live thinking that the mother has sole power? (The law often collude with this fantasy that in the personality structure creates many hardships)
is good for the child can not have both parents as much as possible?
nature would always be parents together. The company has created the alternatives and the law lays down the rules for these "Alternative". In child protection, the law should not facilitate the kind? Certainly there are situations in which fathers are fugitives and have no chance to be there ... ... you can not force them. But where there is a father and want to realize the nature because the law prevents it? Because the law beats these fathers, tightening, leading in some cases to say. ... Disappear! or be willing to pay it. Perhaps we should review
many stories, perhaps many irresponsible fathers judged, they are now absent because of bad and selfish mother (who now know they exist) and the law blindly supports them.
The law should be fair and equitable. Do not be prejudiced and / or stereotypes.
is good for the child to hear "good morning" or "good night" from his father only twice per month, compared to 26 times those of the mother?
is good for the child to lunch or dinner only twice a month with his father over 26 with her mother?
is good for the child to deny the feelings that were born spontaneously than patients that are imposed because it managed to power? These are not violent?
is good for the child share the mother's selfishness and lies for love and honesty? How will grow up with a sound structure?
is good for the child living primarily with mother, self-interest and power proves single? We are not a society based on famiglia? Che carico avrà questo bambino, manipolato, verso questa madre che dichiara "sono solo tua" poi lo scarica dai nonni in verità per farsi la sua vita? Mi dispiace per questa donna che per sentirsi qualcuno ha bisogno di sentire di possedere qualcuno, il bambino. Ma provo dolore profondo pensando al bambino che deve subire questo. È violenza, violenza sottile, profonda, senza lividi e contusioni che si vedono ma ferite interne che sanguinano.
è bene per il bambino farlo sentire vittima e portarlo, come in alcuni "rapiti", ad essere protettore del proprio carnefice? Perché questo è quello che accade quando il bambino vede che un solo genitore ha il potere di togliergli l'altro, non sa che il vero potere è stato of blind justice.
three years trying to document, not to understand the child's sense of ownership ... in the end I would have thought that it was easy for me as well, we're young and given the mother's behavior, we might as well forget about the child. But his eyes can not be forgotten. Children have the right to receive the "wings" to fly from adults, not weights and heavy weights for their souls.
times the courts are so long, if that server is allowed to be social close the "practical" one encounter made two years ago to go to school now that the baby grew up, unable to express themselves more, would beyond what necessarily wanted to see.
I read about a judge who postponed the decision for custody of a teenager he read in the newspaper that the girl had committed suicide in the meantime. That father was right, that mother was a bad mother angry ... .. but now that matter, young life that could not fly!
This new law could help but is blocked by red tape, by prejudice, preconceptions, from old habits born at different times. ... In the meantime, too many children, including our live their pain in silence because they can not d ' express themselves and be heard.
Wonder if you can answer, a comparison, aid ... ..
I'm not used to bore those not interested and even to sell off my pain and that of the people I love. If these questions are of interest in other people, fathers, mothers, lawyers, judges, politicians are ready to share our personal story convinced that maybe we could go really well, one day, to protect children, children of the world.
I think it is the duty of all to find solutions for them if we are right in a civilized country.
A woman, a wife, mother without a chair!
thank the people who respond and those who already help my husband and me.
